It's unclear, however, what "meaningful" support means in this context, as their "informal" agreement, as her lawyer describes, has yet to be made public.
In June 2018, court documents were filed showing a bitter situation brewing between the pair as they battled over custody and time with their children, Pax, 14, Zahara, 13, Shiloh, 12, and 9-year-old twins Vivienne and Knox. Jolie wants the judge to issue a formal child support order, making it retroactive.
Now Pitt pals are fuming to Page Six that the "Seven" star has in fact been forking over hundreds of thousands a month - and that Jolie is just trying to smear her ex by claiming he's a "deadbeat dad". As part of the agreement, Jolie was required to provide Pitt with each of the children's cell phone numbers so that he could call them directly.More news: Jason Bateman's hilarious advice for The Bachelorette's Becca and Garrett
More news: First look at Margot Robbie in new film with Leonardo DiCaprio
More news: Willian Confirms FC Barcelona Offer, Chelsea FC Stay
ET Canada has reached out to Pitt's rep for further comments. A source familiar with the matter, who was not authorized to speak publicly, said that "Brad is someone who fulfills his commitments".
The insider told People magazine: "The filing today was only intended for the marriage to be dissolved, and before everything else can be dissolved, things have to be done by both parties, including financial disclosure and child support". "The motion today was created to move all of that forward".
"Jolie's attorney, Samantha Bley DeJean, wrote in the brief, "[Pitt] has a duty to pay child support. Last week, Jolie's spokesperson denied to ET that Jolie was parting ways with Wasser after a TMZ report claimed that the attorney was quitting over internal conflicts with Jolie.
A document surfaced earlier this summer, which showed their judge ordered Jolie to give Pitt more time with their six children. "It's deplorable that someone for their own selfish reasons leaked selective portions of the confidential and sealed court record to create an inaccurate and unfair picture of what is really happening".